jump to navigation

*snickers* January 19, 2006

Posted by Administrator in Mechanistic Relativism.
trackback

Much earlier in this blog, I suggested that Richard Dawkins, the notorious natural scientist might be open to the idea of the existence of God in an interview he gave some years ago.

Well, I was quite thoroughly raked over the coals by some resident MRTs. . .for daring to suggest that Dawkins had even the hint of monotheism in him.

Then I came across this little tidbit in the Times (UK):

Scientists all over the nation must hold their heads and groan whenever Richard Dawkins appears on television, as he did in The Root of All Evil? (Monday, C4). He is such a terrible advertisement, such an awful embarrassment, the Billy Graham of the senior common room. His splenetic, small-minded, viciously vindictive falsetto rant at all belief that isn’t completely rooted in the natural sciences is laughable. Dawkins is a born-again Darwinist, an atheist, so why is he devoting so much blood pressure and time to arguing with something he knows doesn’t exist? If it’s not there, Richard, why do you keep shouting at it? He looks like a scientific bag lady screaming at the traffic, and watching him argue with a fundamentalist Christian, you realise they were cut from identical cloth, separated at birth. Dawkins is, of course, the archetype of a man who protests too much, and I’d say he’s well on his way to, if not a Pauline, then at least a Muggeridgian conversion. Any day now, he’ll be back on telly quoting CS Lewis.

The author raises a point: Why is Dawkins so curmedgeonly on the topic? Remember, the opposite of love is not hate, but apathy. Dawkins is not apathetic on the subject of the existence of God.

On another note, can you IMAGINE the NYTimes running such an article? Never, not even down to Dante’s Ninth Circle of Hell. I find it delicious that the UK Times can tweak the materialist/atheistic establishment, but no paper in the US to the left of the Washingon Times would ever dare challenge the regnant cultural mouthpieces.

Advertisements

Comments»

1. Suraj - June 27, 2006

Dawkins is fighting in his own way like what a M.L.King fought about Racism (no, I’m not even trying to talk about King’s Faith based reasoning for the fight).

Your understanding of his point of view is poor and I am not surprised you write hate-blogs like this one. (and why am I wasting my time on reading hate crap like yours, you ask? Because I think its important to justify dawkins’ stand).

Forget the innumerous lives lost fighting wars born out of religious fanaticism. Dawkins is trying to get rid of ignorance preached in masses that can lead to destruction at a large scale (“Creation Science”? Can you imagine the dire consequences?). He is rightly playing his part as an atheist in fighting this ignorance that spreads like a virus.

Ever heard about this man called Periyar? Dawkins is doing to wide-spread blind belief based hatred and ignorance what Periyar attempted to stop birth-based discrimination.

In all, I see that you just have a too narrow minded view on Atheists.

2. demolition65 - June 27, 2006

Wow. You went a ways back. . .

“hate” blog? Hmmm. Perhaps a case of the pot calling the kettle black. . .when the kettle is in fact a mauvey-shade of pinkey russet.

But i have a feeling that you are suffering from a form of color-blindness common to MRTs. I prescribe going to church for you.

As for your points: I challenge dawkins’ blind adherence to atheism, not his challenges to “creation science”


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: