“Conservative” vs. “Republican” March 29, 2007Posted by Administrator in Politics, Stupid Party vs Evil Party.
Dana over at Principled Discovery has a fine post up on this disctinction. It distills quite nicely for me why I am so vociferously opposed to the Party of the Asses, while simultaneously unattracted to the Party of the Pachyderms.
She checks herself against Russell Kirk’s “Conservative Principles.” Check yourself, and read her post to check hers:
First, the conservative believes that there exists an enduring moral order.
Um, yeah. No question.
Second, the conservative adheres to custom, convention, and continuity.
Generally speaking. Though one does need to question convention to make sure it’s working for you.
Third, conservatives believe in what may be called the principle of prescription.
I would say I generally subscribe to this. As Dana says, check the article for a definition. I may sum up in a brutally simple way by stating that all the really good ideas were cooked up a long time ago, and we still follow those ideas not because our parents and forefathers did, but because they worked, and they still do.
Fourth, conservatives are guided by their principle of prudence.
Check. Though I do have a nasty instinct that makes me sometimes leap before I think.
Fifth, conservatives pay attention to the principle of variety.
Not for it’s own sake.
Sixth, conservatives are chastened by their principle of imperfectability.
Oh wow. Serious conservatives, serious Christians cannot avoid this. And I see a breathtaking lack of this humility on the Left.
Seventh, conservatives are persuaded that freedom and property are closely linked.
Boom yeah. Self-evident.
Eighth, conservatives uphold voluntary community, quite as they oppose involuntary collectivism.
Another “Boom yeah.”
Ninth, the conservative perceives the need for prudent restraints upon power and upon human passions.
Yet again, “Boom yeah.” Less government the better.
Tenth, the thinking conservative understands that permanence and change must be recognized and reconciled in a vigorous society.
So long as change does not get adopted for its own sake, but rather to adopt the genuine needs of an evolving society, I would agree. Besides, a good conservative by definition is wary of (but not opposed to) change.
So, thanks Dana, for allowing me to finally comprehend why I am an Independent that is so nauseated by the Democratic Party.
BTW Dana, fine picture of Russell Kirk. My in-laws have one on their wall, where Kirk is talking to my brother-in-law, trademark “goofy tie” fully visible in its debatable splendor. I noticed that in your picutre Kirk buttoned his jacket so that Reagan wouldn’t ask, “Why is your tie stopped 8 inches above your belt?”